|
International Solidarity and Support, Volume1
South African Democracy Education Trust
CONTENTS
-
Chapter 1 - Introduction - By Essop Pahad
-
Chapter 2 - The United Nations and the struggle for
liberation in South Africa - By Enuga S. Reddy
-
Chapter 3 - Solidarity: India and South Africa - By
Vijay Gupta
-
Chapter 4 - The International Defence and Aid Fund for
Southern Africa - By Al Cook
-
Chapter 5 - In the Heart of the Beast: the British Anti-Apartheid
Movement, 1959-1994 - By Christabel Gurney
-
Chapter 6 - The Irish Anti-Apartheid Movement - By Louise
and Kader Asmal and Thomas Alberts
-
Chapter 7 - Sweden and the Nordic countries: Official
solidarity and assistance from the West - By Tor Sellstrom
-
Chapter 8 - From Jan van Riebeeck to solidarity with
the struggle: The Netherlands, South Africa and apartheid -
By Sietse Bosgra
-
Chapter 9 - Anti-Apartheid activity in the European
Community and selected West European coun
-
Part 1 - The European Community and Apartheid: minimal
effective pressure
By Sietse Bosgra
-
Part 2 - Austria and South Africa during Apartheid
By Walter Sauer
-
Part 3 - The anti-apartheid struggle in Belgium as perceived
by the "Comite contre le Colonialisme et l'apartheid"
(CCCA)
By Paulette Pierson-Mathy
-
Part 4 - Hoera vir die Boer hoera!!: Pro- and anti-apartheid
struggles in Flanders And Belgium
By Jan Vanheukelom
-
Part 5 - France-South Africa
By Sietse Bosgra, Jacqueline Derens and Jacques Marchand
-
Part 6 - A history of the Anti-Apartheid Movement in the
Federal Republic of Germany
By Gottfried Wellmer
-
Part 7 - Italy, 'beneficiary' of the apartheid regime,
and its internal opposition
By Cristiana Fiamingo
-
Part 8 - Switzerland and Apartheid: The Swiss Anti-Apartheid
Movement
By Peter Leuenberger
-
Part 9 - Other Mediterranean countries: Spain, Portugal,
Greece
By Sietse Bosgra
-
Part 10 - The Liaison Group of Anti-Apartheid Movements
in the EC
By Sietse Bosgra and Mike Terry
-
Part 11 - AWEPAA: European activists-politicians against
Apartheid
By Peter Sluiter and Sietse Bosgra
- Chapter 10 - Anti-Apartheid Solidarity in United States-South
African Relations: From the Margins to the Mainstream -By William
Minter and Sylvia Hill
-
Chapter 11 - Canadian Solidarity with South Africa's
Liberation Struggle - By Joan Fairweather
-
Chapter 12 - The Anti-Apartheid Movements in Australia
and Aotearoa/New Zealand - By Peter Limb
-
Chapter 13 - "There is no threat from the Eastern
Bloc" - By Vladimir Shubin
-
Chapter 14 - The German Democratic Republic and the
South African liberation struggle - By Hans-Georg Schleicher
-
Chapter 15 - Cuba: The little giant against apartheid
- By Hedelberto López Blanch
-
Chapter 16 - China's Support to and Solidarity with
South Africa's Liberation Struggle - By Zhong Weiyun and Xu
Sujiang
PREFACE
BACKGROUND
The South African Democracy Education Trust (SADET) was
established as a project Trust after President Thabo Mbeki indicated
his concern about the paucity of historical material on the arduous
and complex road to South Africa's peaceful political settlement
after decades of violent conflict. Following discussions with the
private sector, core funding for SADET was provided by MTN and the
Nedbank Group. In 2004 MTN became the leading sponsor of the project,
while the National Lottery Distribution Trust Fund gave SADET a
grant to carry out the research.
SADET's activities are overseen by a Trust Board, chaired by the
Minister in the Presidency, Dr Essop Pahad, and includes Minister
Lindiwe Sisulu, Dr Meshack Khosa of MTN (replacing Dr Yvonne Muthien
in 2005), Adv. Selby Baqwa (SC) of the Nedbank Group, General A.
Masondo (retired Chief of Service Corps, South African National
Defence Force), Mr Isaac Makopo of the MK Veteran's Association,
Mr Seth Phalatse, Dr Vincent Maphai, Dr Eddy Maloka of the Africa
Institute of South Africa, and Professor Bernard Magubane (SADET).
A project management and research team was established, and consisted
of Professor Bernard Magubane (Project Leader), Dr Gregory Houston
(Project Coordinator), Dr Sifiso Ndlovu (Senior Researcher) and
Mrs Elsa Kruger (Project Administrator). In 2004 Dr Houston was
appointed Executive Director and Professor Magubane Editor-in-Chief.
MISSION
SADET's mission is to examine and analyse events leading to the
negotiated settlement and democracy in South Africa with a focus
on:
-
the events leading to the banning of the liberation movements;
-
the various strategies and tactics adopted in pursuit of the
democratic struggle;
-
the events leading to the advent of democracy; and
-
the dynamics underpinning the negotiations process between
1990 and 1994.
The study will result in, among others, the publication of 5 volumes
of research covering the successive decades of The Road to Democracy
in South Africa in the run up to the first democratic elections.
Volumes 1 and 2 of The Road to Democracy in South Africa have already
been published and the team is working on Volume 3 on the 1980s.
The current Volume is the first of SADET's second main series of
publications which will focus on International Solidarity with the
liberation struggle. The series covers the contribution of various
international organisations, governments and their peoples, and
solidarity organisations to the liberation struggle in South Africa.
Work has already begun on the second volume, which will focus on
African solidarity with an emphasis on the Organisation of African
Unity (OAU) and its Liberation Committee, various countries in the
Southern African region, including the role that Tanzania and Zambia
played, as well as countries in west, east and north Africa.
TERMS OF REFERENCE
The Road to Democracy project is a chronological analysis of four
decades - 1960-1970, 1970-1980, 1980-1990, 1990-1994, bearing in
mind the four areas of focus above and the following themes for
each decade:
-
Political context: the political dynamics of each decade, such
as the banning of the liberation movements, the formation of
insurgency structures, exile and the containment of resistance
in the 1960s.
-
Key organizations and key individuals: the formation, policies
and objectives, membership and activities of key organizations
during each decade, and the role of key historical, as well
as less well-known but significant, actors.
-
Strategy and tactics: the evolution of the strategy and tactics
of key organizations, including debates around changing strategies
and the impact of adopted strategies and tactics on revolutionary
developments.
-
Regime response: the response of the apartheid regime to the
activities of the liberation movements, including changes in
the nature of the apartheid state, the evolution of policies
to contain resistance, and repression and counter-revolutionary
strategy.
-
International context: the role of the international community
in the liberation of South Africa and international events and
processes that impacted on the liberation struggle.
-
Regional context: regional events and processes that had an
impact on the liberation struggle and the decision to adopt
a negotiation strategy and studies of provincial and local involvement
in the liberation struggle.
-
Outcome: the major outcomes at the end of each decade.
METHODOLOGY
SADET commissioned scholars in a variety of countries, with an
emphasis on nationals from the countries under study, and/or major
actors in the international organisations, governmental agencies
or solidarity movements being reviewed here.
INTERNATIONAL SOLIDARITY, Volume 1
In chapter 2 Enuga Reddy reviews the contribution of the United
Nations and its agencies in promoting world-wide solidarity with
the struggle for liberation in South Africa. He points out that
while the effectiveness of international solidarity depended on
actions by many governments and numerous anti-apartheid and solidarity
groups and other public organizations, the United Nations acted
as an invaluable instrument to promote concerted international action.
Racist oppression in South Africa has been on the agenda of United
Nations bodies since 1946.
The South African Government spurned all appeals to revise its
policies, but the United Nations discussions internationalized the
racial problem in South Africa and built a consensus against apartheid.
After the Sharpeville massacre of 1960, the newly independent African
States, responding to the request of the liberation movement, pressed
for sanctions against South Africa. In 1946, the UN General Assembly
decided, despite opposition of Western governments, to request all
States to consider a series of sanctions against South Africa.
In 1963 the Security Council called for a "voluntary embargo"
on the sale of arms to South Africa. The Council was unable for
many years, because of the opposition of major Western powers, to
decide on mandatory sanctions which all governments are required
to implement. The United Nations became a forum where non-aligned
and Communist states, in particular, tried year after year to press
for mandatory sanctions. In 1977, the Security Council decided unanimously
on a binding arms embargo against South Africa, but was unable to
decide on any economic sanctions. Meanwhile, spurred by its Special
Committee against Apartheid, the United Nations promoted an oil
embargo and other measures by governments; established funds for
assistance to South African political prisoners and their families,
refugees and the liberation movement; encouraged boycotts and other
action by the public. By 1984, most of the smaller Western States,
led by the Nordic countries, supported sanctions against South Africa
and assistance to the liberation movement.
The crisis in South Africa in the mid-1980s and the pressure of
public opinion persuaded the major Western powers to apply some
sanctions while international financial institutions stopped loans
to South Africa and hundreds of corporations withdrew investments
in that country. The advance of the liberation struggle, together
with actions by the governments and the public, obliged the South
African Government to end repression and begin negotiations with
the genuine representatives of the people. The United Nations played
a crucial role in helping the South Africans to overcome serious
difficulties during the process of negotiations and in ensuring
free and fair elections in April 1994.
In chapter 3 Vijay Gupta documents in detail the solidarity and
support the Indian government, solidarity movements and the people
offered to the struggle in South Africa. A year before achieving
formal independence on August 15 1947, India took a major step in
the international arena when it drew attention to South Africa's
racial policies at the United Nations (UN). In June it requested
the UN General Assembly to consider the treatment of Indians in
South Africa, and withdrew its High Commissioner from that country.
India's complaint internationalized the racial problem in South
Africa. In addition, during the last fifty years of the liberation
struggle in South Africa a strong solidarity movement was built
among non-governmental organisations in the country. Starting with
a small discussion group, it eventually reached remote corners of
India. But no separate anti-apartheid movement was formed in India
because the government was taking action with the full support of
the people.
The government, various political parties and the people in general
supported the struggle of the South African people in a variety
of ways. India's role in solidarity has a longer history than that
of any other nation. It has covered many fields. Few countries equalled
India in consistent diplomatic, political, economic and other support
to the cause of liberation in South Africa for well over half a
century. India and Indians played an important role in promoting
solidarity by governments and the public in other countries. It
has taken up the issue not only in the United Nations and in the
Commonwealth, but in many other forums such as the International
Olympic Committee and other international sports bodies. It has
been consistent and this has involved considerable sacrifice. All
political parties and public organisations - trade unions, student
organizations, etc. - were united in solidarity despite their serious
differences on other issues.
The years 1956 to 1991 saw an attempt by the apartheid regime to
crush the Liberation Movement through the courts. This strategy
had a dual aim: firstly it was an attempt to criminalize the struggle
and its leaders, and to enable the regime to present itself as a
standard-bearer of "Western Civilization" under attack
by communism, saboteurs and terrorists; secondly to neutralize anti-apartheid
activists by detaining and imprisoning them. In chapter 4 Al Cook
tells the story of IDAF which helped ensure that neither of these
objectives were realized.
IDAF grew out of a Fund that was formed to defend the accused in
the Treason Trial of 1956-61, and to assist their dependants. It
went on to provide legal defence for the members of all liberation
organizations in the great majority of trials for this entire period.
And it provided assistance to sustain the families of those detained,
imprisoned, and in some cases hanged. It paid for inquests like
those of Looksmart Ngudle, Steve Biko and Neil Aggett, and produced
factual information that it distributed internationally to publicize
what was happening under apartheid and "keep the conscience
of the world alive to the issues at stake". Its activities
were a great boost to the morale of political prisoners and their
families. It was banned in South Africa in 1966, but continued its
work clandestinely from London until it closed at the end of 1991,
transferring its work to South African organizations best placed
to carry it out.
Together with the USA, Britain was South Africa's main ally throughout
the apartheid era. In Chapter 5 Christabel Gurney describes how
the British Anti-Apartheid Movement grew from a group founded by
South African exiles in 1959 into a British mass movement which
united key constituencies in the trade unions, churches, universities,
political parties and local authorities to take anti-apartheid action
in the 1980s.
The Boycott Movement was formed in Britain to internationalise
the South African Congress Movement's call for a boycott within
South Africa of goods produced by firms which supported the National
Party. After the banning of the ANC and PAC in 1960, it was transformed
into the Anti-Apartheid Movement (AAM), which took up the more radical
call of the ANC's underground emergency committee for UN sanctions
and the total isolation of South Africa. This was a key plank of
the AAM's platform until the run-up to the 1994 freedom election.
The chapter argues that in campaigning for sanctions and for support
for the liberation movements, the AAM challenged economic interests
and racial assumptions which permeated British society. At the same
time it campaigned against repression and for freedom for South
African political prisoners. In this it worked closely with the
other main anti-apartheid organisation in Britain, the International
Defence and Aid Fund (see Chapter 00). In the 1980s the underlying
situation was transformed by Britain's economic reorientation towards
the European Community, a change in 'racial norms', South Africa's
isolation within the Southern African region and above all by the
explosion of opposition to apartheid within South Africa.
The AAM won mass support within Britain for sanctions and economic
disengagement from South Africa, and played a leading part in the
world campaign for the release of Nelson Mandela and all other South
African political prisoners. The chapter argues that in spite of
Prime Minister Thatcher's intransigence, the British AAM played
a seminal role in the world campaign for sanctions and helped to
win international recognition of role of the liberation movement.
"No Irish voice has been lifted up in praise of ... Imperialism
... because Ireland has taken sides for ever with the poor"
wrote the poet W B Yeats. It was this anti-imperialist spirit that
accounted for much of the success of the Irish Anti-Apartheid Movement,
which succeeded in rallying people from all walks of life and of
varying political views, from the north as well as the south of
Ireland. Chapter 6 is a study of the Anti-Apartheid movement in
this small country, which had little trade with South Africa and
was not in a position to exert a material influence when it came
to sanctions. Louise and Kader Asmal and Thomas Alberts show that
the determined stand of Irish people against apartheid in sport,
manifested when all-white sports teams toured the country in the
60s, made a considerable impact. For most of its existence, the
IAAM was staffed entirely by volunteers, and depended largely on
the subscriptions of its members and affiliated organisations for
finance, as well as on the generosity of artists who performed at
concerts or donated paintings for auction. Its greatest support
came from the trade unions, north and south, and it was their refusal
to provide the necessary services that brought about the cancellation
of a number of sporting events and conferences where South Africa
was represented.
The Irish Government, though in agreement early on to putting
South Africa on the United Nations agenda, was not so keen to take
concrete steps to end apartheid. It took 10 young women shopworkers
going on strike for three and a half years in 1984 because they
refused to handle South African fruit to finally persuade the Irish
Government to ban the import of apartheid fruit and vegetables.
For nearly 30 years the Movement publicised events in South Africa,
always scrupulous in recording the facts as accurately as possible.
It relied greatly for its material on the International Defence
and Aid Fund, with which it had a close relationship, as well as
on the United Nations Centre against Apartheid. It's nearly thirty
years of existence were not without controversy. At the end of the
day though the influence of Irish history, the inclusive spirit
of the Freedom Charter of the African National Congress, and the
example set by the liberation movement members who upheld their
principles of non-racism in the face of appalling racist oppression,
came powerfully together. The combination brought a high level of
awareness and support for the liberation struggle in Ireland.
During the Cold War, the South and Southern African liberation
movements were generally shunned by the Western world as 'Communist'
or 'terrorist'. Guided by the UN General Assembly, as early as in
1969, however, the Swedish parliament voted to assist them with
official humanitarian assistance, breaking the mould which reduced
the liberation struggles to a battlefield between the contending
super powers, as well as paving the way for a unique and expanding
involvement by the Nordic countries in practically all fields barring
the supply of arms. In Chapter 7, Tor Sellström paints a background
to the dissident Nordic position; outlines the policies adopted
by Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden; discusses how the ANC was
regarded as a South African 'government-in-waiting'; and gives an
account of the actual assistance. The issue of economic sanctions
is also covered. While the Nordic NGO anti-apartheid movements played
a decisive advocacy role, Sellström describes how a close partnership
developed between the ANC and the Nordic governments, with a particular
focus on Sweden. Tables on official assistance are included, illustrating
that Sweden was the prime financial supporter of the ANC in exile,
as well as during the transition of 1990-94. In recognition of his
particular role, the chapter ends with a note on the late Swedish
Prime Minister Olof Palme and his contributions towards a principled,
non-aligned stance in favour of liberation, non-racialism and majority-rule.
The early Dutch colonization of South Africa, the traditional religious
connections, the links with the Afrikaner language and the relative
large number of Dutch emigrants in South Africa all contributed
to the large interest in South African affairs, including the anti-apartheid
struggle, in Dutch society. They explain the extensive media coverage
and the emergence of strong anti-apartheid movements in the Netherlands,
which is the subject of chapter 8, written by Sietse Bosgra. Bosgra
shows that the issue of apartheid led to frequent and heated confrontations
between a majority in parliament and many sectors of civil society
on the one hand, and the government on the other, about sanctions
against South Africa. For instance, the protestant churches supported
sanctions and assistance to the ANC, while the trade unions and
development NGOs played an important role in the anti-apartheid
campaigns. Local authorities often found themselves in conflict
with the Dutch government as they introduced their own economic
sanctions against South Africa. In the 1970s and 1980s these contradictions
became more and more evident.
The motor of this development were the Dutch anti-apartheid organisations
(AAMs). The AAMs were able to mobilize public opinion and would
for a large part determine the agenda of the political discussions
in the press, in parliament and government. Among the most important
issues that they raised were the oil embargo, loans by Dutch banks
to the apartheid state and its organs, the import of coal, the sale
of Krugerrands, and the sale of South African products in major
retail stores. In some respects they were able to influence government
action, for instance, when it forced the government to introduce
some non-economic sanctions such as denouncing the cultural agreement
with South Africa and the introduction of visa requirements, and
blocking the entry into the Netherlands of officials of the South
African government and the "independent homelands" and
visitors who came for sport, culture and science. The AAMs also
provided much needed Dutch material support to the ANC.
After the introduction of apartheid in South Africa the West European
countries continued the close and friendly relations with white
South Africa. They were based on economic profits and feelings of
kinship. Moreover, during the Cold War era, South Africa was considered
part of the "free world" of anti-communist states. But,
as international opposition to apartheid grew, national anti-apartheid
organisations emerged in the different European countries under
study. The result was that governments and companies were increasingly
forced to change their policy and South Africa became more and more
isolated. In chapter 9 the role of nine West European countries
and the work of their anti-apartheid movements are described by
a variety of authors. The Scandinavian countries, the Netherlands,
Britain and Ireland will be described in other chapters in this
Volume. Although the development of anti-apartheid movements was
to a large extent similar, each country had its own particularities.
In the early 1960s France played important role as a supplier of
arms to apartheid South Africa, while Italy also was not only an
important arms exporter to South Africa but was also involved in
the large scale importation of South African gold. West Germany
was in the front line in the anti-communist struggle, which formed
an important impediment for the anti-apartheid campaigns. Belgium,
which is splitting up into a French and Flemish, had two distinct
sets of relationships with apartheid South Africa and separate anti-apartheid
movements. In the Flemish half of the country feelings of kinship
with the Afrikaners had an influence on the anti-apartheid activities.
The linkages Austria and Switzerland had with the apartheid state
were less obvious and therefore often overlooked, and this constituted
an obstacle for the anti-apartheid movements which was not easy
to overcome. Portugal, Spain and Greece had limited relations with
South Africa, and here the anti-apartheid movements were less developed.
During the apartheid period more and more West European countries
became members of the European Communities (EC), and more and more
powers were transferred from the national governments to the EC.
The West European anti-apartheid movements concluded that they had
to coordinate their activities on the EC level. "The Liaison
Group of Anti-Apartheid Movements in the EC" was born as a
strong trans-national anti-apartheid movement. West-European members
of parliament who supported the anti-apartheid struggle also concluded
that they would have to coordinate their activities, leading to
the establishment of AWEPAA, the Association of West European Paliamentarians
for Action against Apartheid, based in Amsterdam.
In Chapter 10 William Minter and Sylvia Hill trace the long history
of ties between opponents of racism in the United States and South
Africa and the stages by which anti-apartheid organizations and
political sentiment became strong enough in the 1980s to shift public
opinion and government policy even in the conservative Reagan era.
They survey the contradictory contexts of U.S. government and business
complicity with the white minority regime and the evolution of the
U.S. civil rights, Black power, and anti-war movements, essential
historical contexts within which African solidarity and anti-apartheid
groups evolved.
The story includes not only a range of national Africa-focused
organizations, including the Council on African Affairs, the American
Committee on Africa / The Africa Fund, the American Friends Service
Committee, TransAfrica, and the Washington Office on Africa, but
also a host of local groups like the Southern Africa Support Project
as well as sector-specific or shorter-lived groups that collectively
reached almost every sector of American society with the anti-apartheid
message. While this diverse movement in a racially and socially
divided and geographically vast country never featured an organizationally
unified national coalition, it successfully mobilized around the
twin themes of support for African liberation and opposition to
the complicity of U.S. business and government with apartheid.
The movement involved not only African Americans but also white
Americans, Africans from other countries, and those of other minority
racial groups, Throughout this history, South African visitors and
exiles played catalytic roles in the organization of the movement
in the United States, from early ANC leaders such as A. B. Xuma
and Z. K. Matthews to later activist exiles such as Miriam Makeba,
Dennis Brutus, and Dumisani Kumalo.
In chapter 11 Joan Fairweather demonstrates how, as a predominantly
"white" middle power, Canada's contribution to South Africa's
liberation struggle was somewhat ambiguous. While the Canadian government
was openly critical of apartheid policies it was often reluctant
to transform its abhorrence into meaningful action. Throughout the
period under review, Canadian foreign policy relating to Southern
Africa was heavily influenced by its relationships with Britain
and the United States, its closest allies and trading partners.
However, thanks to public pressure and the tireless efforts exerted
by Canadian churches, trade unions, and development organizations,
Canada gradually developed other allegiances - the most important
being with newly-independent African states and fellow-members of
the Commonwealth.
Although these connections tended to be concentrated on trade and
humanitarian aid, as opposed to direct assistance to the liberation
movements, Canada's friendship was recognized by many African leaders
and laid the groundwork for a more significant role in South Africa's
liberation struggle. While no single, cohesive anti-apartheid organization
emerged in Canada, the public sector drew inspiration and direction
from a wide range of partner organizations in South Africa and became
the backbone of Canada's solidarity movement.
In chapter 12 Peter Limb presents the history of the anti-apartheid
movement in Australia and New Zealand. The nature of this movement
is explained, its history in both countries and their interactions
detailed, and the movement's significance and lessons are discussed.
The history of the anti-apartheid movement(s) in Aotearoa/New Zealand
and Australia is the history of multi-faceted solidarity action
with strong international but also regional and historical dimensions
that gave it specific features, most notably the important role
of sports sanctions and the relationship of indigenous peoples'
struggles to the AAM. Most writings on the AAM in Australia are
in the form of memoirs and New Zealand too has seen insightful memoirs
and several fine studies of the divisive 1981 rugby tour, as well
as comprehensive studies of South Africa-New Zealand relations.
However, the internal history of the AAM is less known.
What were its origins, divisions, and triumphs? To what extent
were its politics influenced by ideas of solidarity, or were they
more a reflection of South African political forces (including exiles)
or perhaps of national politics? How united, how effective, was
it? This chapter comprehensively outlines the history of the movement
in all its components and phases. The chapter traces the early history
of ties between the countries and South Africa, the first protests
against South African racially-selected sporting teams, and the
emergence of the AAM from the 1960s. The struggle over sanctions
is a major theme. The little-known history of the liberation movements
overseas forms an interesting and important part of the chapter.
The relations of the USSR/Russia and its allies in the Eastern
Europe with the liberation movement in South Africa have been a
subject of research by many academics, as well as the issue for
official statements and speculation in the press. But unfortunately,
too often their content was obscured and distorted. Quite a number
of publications in South Africa and in the West claim that the ANC
was playing role of the Soviet "proxy" or "task force."
Chapter 13, written by Vladimir Shubin, is primarily an attempt
to assess the USSR/Russia's attitude to the ANC during the three
decades when the organisation was banned and especially during the
period of profound changes in the two countries. As for the other
East European countries, Bulgaria has been chosen as a case study.
This choice was made, because, as distinct from other former Moscow's
allies, Bulgaria's relations with the South African liberation movement
is undergoing a thorough review by Marina Traikova, a Bulgarian
citizen, who worked in the archives of that country; a relevant
part of the chapter is based on her Master thesis.
Hans-Georg Schleicher argues in chapter 14 that the German Democratic
Republic (GDR) proclaimed anti-imperialist solidarity a basic foreign
policy principle and based her relationship with the South African
liberation movement on common ideological and political values.
Common overall interests between the GDR and the liberation movements
were to some extent conditioned by the East-West Cold War confrontation.
In the GDR the Solidarity Committee was the major instrument for
mobilising, organising and implementing solidarity, co-ordinating
the efforts of political parties, the trade unions as a main sponsor
and other mass organisations. It was embedded into the political
structures of the GDR under the ruling Socialist Unity Party (SED).
Church-related anti-apartheid groups acted outside the official
solidarity movement. There was a broad sense of solidarity among
the GDR population to draw on - but the centralistic and administrative
way of organising solidarity trimmed initiatives from below, undoubtedly
a weakness of GDR solidarity. At the same time the efficiency of
the support for and close relations of the GDR with the liberation
movements were after all results of the strong personal commitment
of many East Germans.
Early contacts existed between the SED and SACP, between the GDR
trade unions and SACTU, and, from 1960 onwards, between the GDR's
Solidarity Committee and the ANC. Solidarity campaigns and practical
support for the struggle during the 1960s and early 1970s focused
on the boycott movement, on economic and sports sanctions against
the apartheid regime and on solidarity with political prisoners
in South Africa. Major areas of GDR assistance were political and
diplomatic support in international organisations, training of cadres,
material support, propaganda and armed struggle. That included printing
of periodicals, books and other material for the ANC. More than
1,000 MK cadres have been trained in the GDR besides individual
fighters being prepared for the deployment in the underground. Scholarships,
training of skilled personnel, support for ANC training centres,
substantial material and infrastructural assistance, medical treatment
for the sick and wounded add to the dimension of assistance. Party-to-party
relations between the SED and the ANC and a semi-diplomatic ANC
mission in Berlin indicated the level of bilateral relations.
While the economic crisis in the GDR in the 1980s limited the material
means of GDR solidarity, the help for the liberation movements was,
however, not reduced. "New thinking" in the GDR Africa
policy in favour of a political settlement in Southern Africa did
not affect the support for liberation movements negatively. The
brand of GDR solidarity has always been partnership on equal terms
and speedy and efficient support, thus providing a valuable contribution
for the South African liberation struggle. The collapse of the GDR
in 1989/90 interrupted solidarity relations. It took some time for
efforts to preserve valuable traditions and maintain the commitment
to solidarity, but meanwhile solidarity in East Germany has been
resurrected from the grassroots.
From the very start, after the triumph of the Revolution in January
1959, Cuba supported the anti-apartheid struggle, including at different
international events, where its representatives condemned the racist
policies and racial segregation of that system institutionalized
by Pretoria; at the same time, they urged support for the South
African people's fight for national liberation. That support increased
continually, and is the subject of Chapter 15, written by Hedelberto
Lopez Blanch. Cuban troops, sometimes numbering up to 50,000, fought
together with Angolan forces against South Africa's troops, until
then described as "invincible." Intense military combat
took place in Angola from 1975 to 1988, culminating in the disaster
for the racist South Africans at the battle of Cuito Cuanavale.
Given the constant threats against Cuba by various administrations
of the United States - a staunch enemy that in 1960 imposed an unending,
ferocious blockade against the small Caribbean island - and the
modesty that has characterized leaders of the Cuban Revolution,
many of the events and information narrated in this chapter appear
for the first time, given that author Hedelberto López Blanch
was given access to recently declassified documents.
The tripartite talks between Cuba, the ANC and the Soviet Union;
the holding of the Seventh Congress of the South African Communist
Party in Cuba; the training of ANC guerrilla fighters in Cuba and
other African countries; the combats against racist forces in Angola,
and the discussions that opened the way to Namibia's independence
and subsequently, the first free elections in South Africa, as well
as comments by high-ranking leaders of the ANC and outstanding South
Africans, are included in this chapter, which is also a reflection
of the Cuban people's lofty spirit of humanism and internationalism.
In the chapter 16, China's Support to and Solidarity with South
Africa's Liberation Struggle, Zhong Weiyun and Xu Sujiang make an
introduction on New China's policy towards Africa and its evolution
and changes. Then they focused on the development and changes of
China's, especially the CPC's relationship with ANC, PAC and SACP.
They also touch upon the political, moral and material support and
training that China rendered to these organizations. The concluding
part of the chapter deals with the Chinese government's trade and
economic sanctions against South Africa.
To top
About Us | Gallery
| Sponsers | Related
Links | Contact | Interviews
| Home
|